Speaker Dillon talks about government reform, but his inaction speaks volumes

January 14, 2010

Speaker of the House Andy Dillon, a Democrat candidate for governor, was on WJR with Frank Beckmann this morning talking about the need for “commonsense” reform of government.

He talked about restructuring, consolidating and streamlining government.

Yet his record with government reform at the local level is one of inaction.

After I was on Beckmann’s show on February 13, 2009, to discuss my efforts to abolish my own office, Dillon called in and promised to support legislation in the House of Representatives.

Well, the legislation, House Bill No. 5216, was introduced last summer and there’s been no action.

Dillon has the power to move this commonsense reform of local government, yet he hasn’t.

Why?

- Dennis


Where we stand on reforming county government

January 6, 2010

Lansing’s inability to tackle the most basic and most commonsense reform proposal — the notion that local government should be flexible to the needs of local communities — is frustrating to say the least.

As readers of this blog know, bills have sat in committee, in both houses of the Legislature, for months.

Commitments from Democrats and Republicans to move legislation allowing the people of Cheboygan County a referendum on whether they want the Office of Drain Commissioner have come and went.

Yet, the bills are still there.

Why?

The precise answer isn’t for certain. There was a budget debacle, a shutdown — albeit brief — of state government and then there’s the constant partisan bickering from both parties that prevents anything good for Michigan from getting accomplished.

There’s also the fact that the entrenched special interests oppose anything that change the status quo.

As I’ve said time and time again, my proposal is a commonsense reform of government.

It doesn’t force counties to devolve the drain commissioner’s duties and responsibilities if there isn’t genuine support to do so. It’s even supported by fellow drain commissioners in Northern Michigan.

Yet for whatever reason, these bills remain in committee.

I hate to be a skeptic, but it’s becoming clearer and clearer that Lansing isn’t working .

- Dennis


Reform makes sense in Northeast Michigan

November 14, 2009

The Alpena News ran a story on my bipartisan proposal to allow counties to abolish the office of drain commissioner in Friday’s newspaper.

While my effort to give home rule to counties has been overshadowed by the state’s ongoing budgetary woes, it is getting more support and more attention.

Alpena County Drain Commissioner Don Wood, a Democrat, signed on to the bipartisan proposal. He told The Alpena News that “it’s it’s up to the commissioners. If they feel it would be more efficient to move it into the road commission, I don’t have an objection.”

Commissioner Wood’s sentiments were shared by my colleague from Presque Isle County, Charlie Lyon, a Republican. Commissioner Lyon feels his community needs the drain commissioner’s office, which is fine by me. Ultimately, it’s their choice under my bipartisan proposal.

It’s the twenty-first century and government in Michigan still resembles the nineteenth century. We have too many politicians and too many layers of government. We have to consolidate where it makes sense, and local communities should be allowed to make these sorts of decisions.

After all, local communities are in a better position than Lansing to know the system of government that works best as well as which offices they need or don’t need.

- Dennis


FireDennis.com back in the news

November 6, 2009

A good story on my effort to reform government by starting with my own office was written by Adam DeLay of the Capitol News Service earlier today.

Drain commissioner wants to pull plug on his job

By ADAM DeLAY
Capital News Service

LANSING – While many people are fighting for jobs in this tough economy, one Cheboygan County official is fighting to lose his.

Drain Commissioner Dennis Lennox, R-Topinabee, is pushing for the county to eliminate his position, because he feels it’s unnecessary.

“I ran on a platform of allowing the county to eliminate the position, and beat a two-term incumbent who did nothing,” he said.

Michigan is the only state with such an office, which dates back to statehood. Counties with more than 12,000 people must have a drain commissioner. The duties include overseeing construction and maintenance of sewer and storm drains, awarding contracts for drain construction and approving drainage in new developments.

Lennox said the change would be an important step in streamlining government.

“It’s time for structural reform that brings government into the 21st century,” he said.

But Joseph Rivet, president of the Michigan Association of Drain Commissioners, disagrees with the idea. He said the office is evolving and in line with the times.

“Since taking office, I’ve fought to secure water quality grants for the county and I would say the job is focusing more on water quality every day,” Rivet added.

“Could you maybe save a few thousand dollars by eliminating the office? Sure, but counties would then be losing this developing ability to aggressively focus on water quality and pursue grants.”

Lennox, who makes just under $4,000 a year as drain commissioner, said the position isn’t needed in Cheboygan County and suggests the duties move to the road commission.

“Offices are funded on permits and special assessments. If the Drain Commissioner isn’t abolished Cheboygan County will have to spend and additional $50,000-70,000,” he said.

“Michigan has way too many levels of government with way too many politicians. The road commission has the staff and resources to take over the duties, and I think the offices can be consolidated.”

The proposal has the attention of some members of the Legislature.

Rep. Rick Jones, R-Grand Ledge, has introduced a bill to let counties with fewer than 35,000 residents vote to eliminate the office. Before a public vote, the change would need approval by both the county commission and the drain commissioner.

Jones said the bill is limited to counties with fewer than 35,000 residents because it is the lower populated northern counties that would like to get rid of the office.

“We figured the bill would have a better chance of passing if we tailored it to those counties instead of opening up a can of worms with larger counties in the lower part of the state who want to keep their drain commissioners,” he said.

Sen. Jason Allen, R-Traverse City, is sponsoring a parallel bill in the Senate.

Thirty-nine of the state’s counties have populations under 35,000, including Gladwin, Emmet and Mason, Alcona, Presque Isle, Manistee, Leelanau, and most of the Upper Peninsula.
Rivet said population isn’t a factor in determining the importance of a drain commissioner, and in some counties the position is critical.

“It’s about the miles of drain in the county,” he said. “In Bay County, where I’m commissioner, we have a lot of drains to look after. Also, if any significant developments start in the county, it’s important to have a drain commissioner to make sure developers follow the drainage standards that are in place.”

Lennox said he recognizes the position is needed in some counties, but others should be free to eliminate it.

“Any county should be able to determine the kind of local government and the positions they want or don’t want,” he said.

Rivet, however, said he doesn’t think eliminating drain commissioners will save counties a lot of money because another agency will need to carry out the responsibilities and, “will probably cost the same,”

“Counties fund the office based on how much need there is for it. There are some counties with no drains and those commissioners make very little,” he said.

In Gogebic County the drain commissioner is paid only $1 a year.

Monica Ware, public relations specialist for the County Road Association of Michigan (CRAM), says her organization opposes the bills because they don’t give road commissions a say in taking on the responsibilities of drain commissioners.

“CRAM would support the bill if it was amended to require approval of the road commission as well as the county commission and drain commissioner, but right now it doesn’t,” she said.

Ware also said counties wouldn’t save much by eliminating the position. “They would still have to provide funding for the operation, maintenance and improvement of drain services, including permits”

Jones’ bill is pending in the House Intergovernmental and Regional Affairs Committee, and Allen’s bill in the Senate Local, Urban and State Affairs Committee.

© 2009, Capital News Service, Michigan State University School of Journalism. Not to be reproduced without permission.

It’s worth pointing out that Rivet, a Democrat, only ran for drain commissioner in Bay County because term limits forced him out of the Legislature and he needed a job to pay the bills.

The Capitol News Service, provides news coverage of state government for newspapers across Michigan, including the Cheboygan Daily Tribune, Petoskey News-Review and Traverse City Record-Eagle. For the record, I’m an avid reader of their stories, which are written by Michigan State University journalism students.

- Dennis


An update on what’s happening

October 28, 2009

Unfortunately, the ongoing budget wrangling in Lansing is preventing action on legislation to allow the people of Cheboygan County a vote on the future of the drain commissioner’s office.

While the bills in the Senate and House have received bipartisan support, legislators are still trying to sort out the budget mess that continues to get worse with every day.

Hopefully, Senate Bill No. 758 and House Bill No. 5216 will soon pass out of committee and go to the floors for a vote.

- Dennis